Example 5 — In Review #16

New issue

Open

opened 2026-09-04 19:02:37 +00:00 by Xeplosion · 1 comment

Xeplosion commented

2026-09-04 19:02:37 +00:00

Owner

Copy link

This is an Example Issue

This issue is currently in In Review because the substantive work is complete and the result is awaiting validation, testing, approval, or merge.

At this stage:

Resolution/Confirmed remains applied.
The appropriate Kind/ and Priority/ labels remain in place.
Active execution on the issue has stopped, and any Forgejo work timer should be stopped.
The implementation, research, documentation, configuration, or other deliverable is considered complete enough for review.
Any associated pull request should be linked to the issue.
Reviewers should verify that the work satisfies the issue scope and acceptance criteria.
Required testing, technical validation, documentation review, or compatibility checks should be completed here.
Relevant Compat/ labels should be applied to pull requests when the change has a compatibility impact.
A review comment must be left documenting what was reviewed, what validation or testing was performed, what findings were identified, and whether the work was accepted or requires changes.
The review comment should link any relevant pull requests, commits, test results, documentation, or follow-up issues where applicable.
Any requested changes or review findings should be documented before additional work begins.

If review identifies substantive changes that require further execution, move the issue back to In Progress and restart the Forgejo timer when active work resumes.

Once the work has been accepted, all required reviews and checks have passed, and any associated pull request has been merged, move the issue to Completed.

Workflow Lifecycle

Triage

Kind/ classification confirmed
Issue validity reviewed and appropriate Reviewed/ label assigned
Priority/ assigned when appropriate
Applicable Branch/ label(s) assigned when branch targeting matters
Information requirements resolved; no Status/Needs More Info remains
Status/Needs Triage removed before leaving Triage

Backlog

Issue is confirmed valid and accepted into the project backlog

To Do

Scope and expected outcome are sufficiently defined
Known prerequisites, dependencies, and required decisions are resolved or understood
Work has been deliberately selected as upcoming work

In Progress

Assignee or active owner identified when appropriate
Forgejo timer started when time tracking provides meaningful value
Relevant implementation, research, or work notes recorded as needed
Forgejo timer stopped when active work ends, pauses, or becomes blocked

Review Gate

Review requirement assessed based on complexity, criticality, reversibility, and impact
If review is required: moved to In Review and appropriate testing / validation performed
If review is required: review comment records what was reviewed, how it was validated, findings, and outcome
If review is not required: rationale is evident from the low-risk nature of the change

Completed

Acceptance criteria / intended outcome satisfied
Related PRs, commits, documentation, or external changes linked where applicable
Final resolution comment explains what changed, how the issue was resolved, and how it was verified
Follow-up work split into separate issues where appropriate
Any Forgejo timer is stopped and recorded time is final
Issue moved to Completed and closed

# This is an Example Issue This issue is currently in **In Review** because the substantive work is complete and the result is awaiting validation, testing, approval, or merge. At this stage: * `Resolution/Confirmed` remains applied. * The appropriate `Kind/` and `Priority/` labels remain in place. * Active execution on the issue has stopped, and any Forgejo work timer should be stopped. * The implementation, research, documentation, configuration, or other deliverable is considered complete enough for review. * Any associated pull request should be linked to the issue. * Reviewers should verify that the work satisfies the issue scope and acceptance criteria. * Required testing, technical validation, documentation review, or compatibility checks should be completed here. * Relevant `Compat/` labels should be applied to pull requests when the change has a compatibility impact. * A review comment must be left documenting **what was reviewed, what validation or testing was performed, what findings were identified, and whether the work was accepted or requires changes**. * The review comment should link any relevant pull requests, commits, test results, documentation, or follow-up issues where applicable. * Any requested changes or review findings should be documented before additional work begins. If review identifies substantive changes that require further execution, move the issue back to **In Progress** and restart the Forgejo timer when active work resumes. Once the work has been accepted, all required reviews and checks have passed, and any associated pull request has been merged, move the issue to **Completed**. ### Workflow Lifecycle ### Triage - [x] `Kind/` classification confirmed - [x] Issue validity reviewed and appropriate `Reviewed/` label assigned - [x] `Priority/` assigned when appropriate - [x] Applicable `Branch/` label(s) assigned when branch targeting matters - [x] Information requirements resolved; no `Status/Needs More Info` remains - [x] `Status/Needs Triage` removed before leaving Triage ### Backlog - [x] Issue is confirmed valid and accepted into the project backlog ### To Do - [x] Scope and expected outcome are sufficiently defined - [x] Known prerequisites, dependencies, and required decisions are resolved or understood - [x] Work has been deliberately selected as upcoming work ### In Progress - [x] Assignee or active owner identified when appropriate - [x] Forgejo timer started when time tracking provides meaningful value - [x] Relevant implementation, research, or work notes recorded as needed - [x] Forgejo timer stopped when active work ends, pauses, or becomes blocked ### Review Gate - [x] Review requirement assessed based on complexity, criticality, reversibility, and impact - [x] If review is required: moved to **In Review** and appropriate testing / validation performed - [x] If review is required: review comment records what was reviewed, how it was validated, findings, and outcome - [x] If review is not required: rationale is evident from the low-risk nature of the change ### Completed - [ ] Acceptance criteria / intended outcome satisfied - [ ] Related PRs, commits, documentation, or external changes linked where applicable - [ ] Final resolution comment explains what changed, how the issue was resolved, and how it was verified - [ ] Follow-up work split into separate issues where appropriate - [ ] Any Forgejo timer is stopped and recorded time is final - [ ] Issue moved to **Completed** and closed

Xeplosion added the

Rows
Columns