Review `docs` markdown files

Xeplosion commented

2026-09-07 16:04:20 +00:00

Owner

Copy link

Where is the problem?

All markdown files in the docs branch of this repo:

ISSUES.md
LABELS.md
PULL_REQUESTS.md
README.md
WORKFLOW.md

Type of documentation issue

Unclear — the documentation exists but is confusing or incomplete

What should change?

Documentation should be thoroughly examined and critiqued. Relevant changes should be made to make the documentation more clear or accurate when necessary.

ISSUES.md reviewed
LABELS.md reviewed
PULL_REQUESTS.md reviewed
README.md reviewed
WORKFLOW.md reviewed

Source of truth / validation

When necessary, documentation steps should be followed to ensure that those steps match the existing workflow.

Additional context

No response

Request checklist

I identified the documentation location or clearly described where the new documentation belongs
I described the intended corrected or improved content

Workflow lifecycle

Triage

Kind/ classification confirmed
Issue validity reviewed and appropriate Reviewed/ label assigned
Priority/ assigned when appropriate
Applicable Branch/ label(s) assigned when branch targeting matters
Information requirements resolved; no Status/Needs More Info remains
Status/Needs Triage removed before leaving Triage

Backlog

Issue is confirmed valid and accepted into the project backlog

To Do

Scope and expected outcome are sufficiently defined
Known prerequisites, dependencies, and required decisions are resolved or understood
Work has been deliberately selected as upcoming work

In Progress

Assignee or active owner identified when appropriate
Forgejo timer started when time tracking provides meaningful value
Relevant implementation, research, or work notes recorded as needed
Forgejo timer stopped when active work ends, pauses, or becomes blocked

Review Gate

Review requirement assessed based on complexity, criticality, reversibility, and impact
If review is required: moved to In Review and appropriate testing / validation performed
If review is required: review comment records what was reviewed, how it was validated, findings, and outcome
If review is not required: rationale is evident from the low-risk nature of the change

Completed

Acceptance criteria / intended outcome satisfied
Related PRs, commits, documentation, or external changes linked where applicable
Final resolution comment explains what changed, how the issue was resolved, and how it was verified
Follow-up work split into separate issues where appropriate
Any Forgejo timer is stopped and recorded time is final
Issue moved to Completed and closed

### Where is the problem? All markdown files in the `docs` branch of this repo: - `ISSUES.md` - `LABELS.md` - `PULL_REQUESTS.md` - `README.md` - `WORKFLOW.md` ### Type of documentation issue Unclear — the documentation exists but is confusing or incomplete ### What should change? Documentation should be thoroughly examined and critiqued. Relevant changes should be made to make the documentation more clear or accurate when necessary. - [x] `ISSUES.md` reviewed - [x] `LABELS.md` reviewed - [x] `PULL_REQUESTS.md` reviewed - [x] `README.md` reviewed - [x] `WORKFLOW.md` reviewed ### Source of truth / validation When necessary, documentation steps should be followed to ensure that those steps match the existing workflow. ### Additional context _No response_ ### Request checklist - [x] I identified the documentation location or clearly described where the new documentation belongs - [x] I described the intended corrected or improved content ### Workflow lifecycle ### Triage - [x] `Kind/` classification confirmed - [x] Issue validity reviewed and appropriate `Reviewed/` label assigned - [x] `Priority/` assigned when appropriate - [x] Applicable `Branch/` label(s) assigned when branch targeting matters - [x] Information requirements resolved; no `Status/Needs More Info` remains - [x] `Status/Needs Triage` removed before leaving Triage ### Backlog - [x] Issue is confirmed valid and accepted into the project backlog ### To Do - [x] Scope and expected outcome are sufficiently defined - [x] Known prerequisites, dependencies, and required decisions are resolved or understood - [x] Work has been deliberately selected as upcoming work ### In Progress - [x] Assignee or active owner identified when appropriate - [x] Forgejo timer started when time tracking provides meaningful value - [x] Relevant implementation, research, or work notes recorded as needed - [x] Forgejo timer stopped when active work ends, pauses, or becomes blocked ### Review Gate - [x] Review requirement assessed based on complexity, criticality, reversibility, and impact - [x] If review is required: moved to **In Review** and appropriate testing / validation performed - [x] If review is required: review comment records what was reviewed, how it was validated, findings, and outcome - [x] If review is not required: rationale is evident from the low-risk nature of the change ### Completed - [x] Acceptance criteria / intended outcome satisfied - [x] Related PRs, commits, documentation, or external changes linked where applicable - [x] Final resolution comment explains what changed, how the issue was resolved, and how it was verified - [x] Follow-up work split into separate issues where appropriate - [x] Any Forgejo timer is stopped and recorded time is final - [x] Issue moved to **Completed** and closed

Xeplosion added the

Rows
Columns

Review docs markdown files #22